The two levels of condo project review and what can trip up your loan.
# Limited vs. Full Condo Review: What Lenders Check
When you buy a condo in Massachusetts, you aren't just being approved as a borrower—the building itself has to pass inspection too. Lenders treat condos differently from single-family homes because you share ownership of common areas, financial obligations, and risk with everyone else in the association. Before they'll fund your loan, they review the condo project to make sure it's a sound investment for the money they're lending.
That review comes in two flavors: limited and full. Which one applies to you depends on your down payment, loan type, and whether the unit is your primary home. Knowing the difference can save you from a nasty surprise late in the process.
A limited review is the lighter-touch option. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac allow it when the loan carries lower risk—typically meaning a larger down payment or lower loan-to-value ratio.
For a primary residence, you generally qualify for a limited review with at least 10% down. For a second home, the threshold is usually 25% down. Investment properties don't qualify for limited review at all.
Under a limited review, the lender skips much of the deep financial scrutiny. They still confirm basics—that the project isn't a condotel, timeshare, or houseboat, that it's not a manufactured home community, and that it carries adequate insurance—but they don't dig into reserves, delinquency rates, or the budget the same way.
A full review is the comprehensive version, required for lower down payments (under 10% on a primary home), second homes with less than 25% down, and all investment purchases. FHA and VA loans have their own separate approval processes that function like a full review.
Here's what lenders examine in a full review:
New England has a lot of older, converted, and small condo projects, which creates specific challenges. Two-, three-, and four-unit conversions—common in Boston, Somerville, Cambridge, and older mill cities—can struggle with owner-occupancy and single-entity rules simply because they're small. In a four-unit building, one investor owning two units already breaks the 20% threshold.
Deferred maintenance is another recurring problem. Older buildings with thin reserves and roofs or heating systems nearing end of life may fail the reserve test. Special assessments and pending litigation over construction defects also surface frequently in newer developments.
Insurance has become a bigger obstacle recently. If the master policy has coverage gaps or the deductible is too high relative to the loan program's limits, the deal can stall until the association fixes it.
Ask for the condo questionnaire and master insurance certificate early. Your lender orders the questionnaire from the association or its management company, and it's where most problems get discovered. The sooner you have it, the more time you have to react.
As a local agent, I (Justin Rollo of Signal Real Estate) often flag likely review issues before an offer even goes in—checking owner-occupancy, recent assessments, and litigation history so buyers aren't blindsided at underwriting. For sellers, getting the association's documents in order before listing prevents deals from collapsing.
Limited reviews are faster and forgiving; full reviews are thorough and unforgiving. Your down payment and property use decide which one you face. In Massachusetts, older and smaller projects are where deals most often break down—so review the association's finances and insurance early, and lean on a local expert to catch problems before they cost you the loan.
Have a condo question? Justin helps buyers and sellers across the South Shore and Boston every day.
Ask Justin →